Party over the People: Florida Democratic Party is more loyal to the party name than the voters who support them

Image

In my November 18, 2013 article entitled, “Vetting Process is Clearly Non-Existent in Florida’s Democratic Party” http://imaconstitutionalist.com/2013/11/18/vetting-process-is-clearly-non-existent-in-floridas-democratic-party/ I discussed multiple questions that arose from my own and others’ personal accounts of meetings with Democratic primary candidate William Rankin who is running for State of Florida CFO.

Specifically, I questioned: Why is this candidate, who knows nothing about the job of the Office of the State CFO, the only viable runner for the Democratic Party, and has he been thoroughly vetted?

The backlash for questioning the process of vetting their candidate has been rather extreme, and somewhat disconcerting. I imagine that the processes are the same for both major parties, equally as inept at screening individuals and as quick to place incompetents in office for the sake of the Party name.

Needless to say, I’ve walked away from this week even more disillusioned and turned-off by a major political party that in one breath touts the protection of civil rights, and in another refuses to provide a voter (who has always voted for both major parties’ candidates based on qualifications) with answers that would help me support – or decline support – of their candidate. This is just frustrating… but I’m not ready to give up quite yet.

Though it’s unclear if it’s even up to the Party leaders to vet the candidates they endorse as Democrats, it’s been made crystal clear that the state-level Florida Democratic Party leaders feel that the vetting of the background of their new Great White Hope is none of my business. Nor do they feel that their own local Committee and Club members for that matter, who have raised questions as well, have the right to ask about their own candidate’s background. I laughed when I heard the phrase “smear campaign.”

Since my initial article, few questions about Rankin’s alleged experience have been answered, and more material facts have arisen that have induced even more reason for inquiry. It’s been confirmed that Rankin was just a Staff Sergeant in the Army (I still love his line about his DD-214 being classified, by the way), and he was certainly not in a position to create policy as he touted at a Veteran’s Day caucus leadership meeting at which I was present. For confirmation of embellished military experience, please check this box.

It’s also been brought to light in the past 48 hours how Rankin is very possibly involved in the misappropriation of his campaign funds, which is now under a budding investigation. Sigh.

Determining if a candidate for the Democratic Party has been vetted, or that his past experiences have even been confirmed, is similar to playing that game of Telephone we used to play in kindergarten.

I’ve been told on the record that the Florida Democratic Party does not vet candidates by the Florida Democratic Party’s Communications Director Joshua Karp, and yet I’ve been told off the record that Rankin was in fact vetted thoroughly by the Florida Democratic Party in Tallahassee through the hazy and twisted grapevine of zone and county leaders throwing around the names of Chairwoman Allison Tant, Executive Director Scott Arceneaux, Chair Alan Clandenin, and John Ramos.

By the time the answer to my initial “call” in the game makes it back to me, it sounds more like, Don’t eat the yellow snow.

So which is it? Alas, still no real answers.

The reality is that, in their bylaws the primary purpose of the Democratic Committees and Clubs is to “to seek out Democratic candidates to run for public office and provide them with assistance and financial support when available” and “to elect Democrats.” There’s no process for vetting or any type of assurance that the best interests of the public voters are held as a standard listed anywhere in their governing documents. It’s just elect Dems, elect Dems, elect Dems. It’s the Party over the People.

That’s almost as haphazard as Rankin telling caucus leaders to “write anything you want about me.” Ugh.

On the heels of recent embarrassments such as Republican Representative Trey Radel’s cocaine possession, the allegations of funds fraud on Democratic Representative Darryl Rouson, and the bankrupted former Democratic flop-candidate for State CFO Allie Braswell, both the Democratic and Republican Parties seem to need a better vetting policy to avoid any more egg on their faces. The fallout from the lack of such a policy is certainly keeping them busy right now. Yet, in the case of William Rankin, not one person in local leadership is willing to stand up and demand a higher standard or change in legislature for candidate selection, nor any other preventative measures that would ensure that the qualifications of the candidates endorsed by the Florida Democratic Party have been verified. It’s a sham process, and they will endorse and lend support to anyone that’s a Democrat, as long as they’re Democrat-ish.

In the face of an election that involves Rankin potentially getting selected for a job that would place him in charge of billions of dollars of funds, directing insurance policy, or providing oversight of over 2,000 staff members, it’s almost preposterous that the Florida Democratic Party leaders endorse candidates like him. I know. I get it. He’s simply all they’ve got.

I can’t really blame Rankin, as he’s bloated his military experiences, omitted his dubious business dealings, and told tall tales of his previous positions of responsibility to the voting public. The Florida Democratic Party is giving him full latitude to embellish, fundraise, and pocket those monies with their (relatively silent) support.

When I think about it… it’s quite the racket. Not one so-called leader of the Florida Democratic Party, in the wake of this year’s disappointments, has provided clear answers about their process, or this candidate’s background, to their own local committee and club members.

Not one so-called leader of the Florida Democratic Party has stepped up to the plate to take responsibility for misleading the public by personally not supporting, while publicly endorsing as a Party, a completely unqualified man named William D. Rankin.

If they can’t even be honest with each other, how can we expect them to be honest with the voters?

20131123-141451.jpg

About imaconstitutionalist

Single mom, US Navy Vet, honorably discharged after awarded for meritorious military service. Former professional musician. Owner of a strategic digital marketing, design and development firm. Volunteer. History and economics major. Staunch Constitutionalist and capitalist. Advocates for women, education, innovation development, legalized medical marijuana, and against parental alienation, the socialist agenda, and misogyny. Extremely proud of my family's patriotic history. Daughter of the American Revolution. Fan of Adam Smith, with a not-so-secret crush on Milton Friedman.
This entry was posted in Politics, Social Topics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Party over the People: Florida Democratic Party is more loyal to the party name than the voters who support them

  1. A person necessarily assist to make severely
    articles I would state. This is the first time I
    frequented your website page and so far? I surprised with
    the analysis you made to make this actual submit extraordinary.

    Excellent job!

  2. Hi i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anyplace, when i read this paragraph i thought i could also make comment due to this brilliant piece of writing.

  3. Ԝow, this paragraph is fastidious, myy younger sister is analyaing such
    things, thus I am goibg to tell her.

  4. Ӊi! I’vе been following youyг web site for somne time now and finally got the courage to ցo ahead aոdd give you a shout out from Atascocita
    Texas! Just wanted to tell you keesp up the good job!

  5. Hellߋ, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar onne and
    i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks?

    If so hοw do you reduϲe it, any plugin or ոything you can suggest?
    I get so muchh lately it’s driving me mad so aոy assistance is very mujch appreciated.

  6. Warner says:

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous
    blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  7. I couldn’t refrain froom commenting. Exceptionally well written!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s